Will Computers Replace Money Managers?


Online investment firms are using algorithms to create diversified portfolios for clients. These “robo investors” are cheaper than financial planners and can create a tax-friendly strategy. The WSJ's Diana Jou finds out more.

Subscribe to the WSJ channel here:


Visit the WSJ channel for more video:


More from the Wall Street Journal:

Visit WSJ.com: http://online.wsj.com/home-page

Follow WSJ on Facebook:


Follow WSJ on Google+: https://plus.google.com/+wsj/posts

Follow WSJ on Twitter: https://twitter.com/WSJLive

Follow WSJ on Instagram: http://instagram.com/wsj

Follow WSJ on Pinterest: http://www.pinterest.com/wsj/

Follow WSJ on Tumblr: http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/wall-street-journal

Don’t miss a WSJ video, subscribe here: http://bit.ly/14Q81Xy

More from the Wall Street Journal:

Visit WSJ.com: http://www.wsj.com

Visit the WSJ Video Center: https://wsj.com/video

On Facebook: https://www.f...

Topics:  Society
Jacob Chakalaka 



This is all well and good... but while I see the advantage of these automated systems over a traditional broker, I still don't understand their value prop when compared to simply stashing my money in a few index funds, rebalancing once a year.

0.5% additional fees are relatively low compared to brokers, but definitely not worthwhile to save the 20 minutes of work it takes to rebalance myself.

Not to mention that I find it hard to trust an algo system that will make rebalancing trades automatically... How often is it going to trade!? Sets off all kinds of alarms regarding both unnecessary excess trades to pass their fees, as well as unwanted short term gains that I wouldn't want taxed